mecconcrehan mecconcrehan .

mecconcrehan

I had always trusted him

Anju was rushed to a hospital on January 11, 2000 with stab wounds she received at her East Delhi residence."I am very very happy.Earlier, Ilyasi was charged with milder provisions, including 304 B dowry death) of the IPC.New Delhi: A Delhi high court two-judge bench on Friday acquitted former TV anchor Suhaib Ilyasi in his wife murder case.

Ilyasi was arrested on March 28, 2000. Justices S. She was declared dead on arrival at the hospital.. However, Anju’s mother Rukma Singh and sister Rashmi Singh had moved the Delhi high court, which in August 2014 ruled that the former TV producer would be tried under Section 302 of the IPC for the offence of murder.Meanwhile, Ilyasi’s daughter Aaliya, who was present at the time of pronouncement of the verdict, expressed happiness and said she always had trust in her father. On December 20 last year, the lower court had sentenced Ilyasi to life imprisonment for stabbing his wife to death, saying he "committed murder and gave it a colour of suicide".Ilyasi shot into limelight after hosting TV crime show — India’s Most Wanted. It had also imposed a fine of `2 lakh on him and directed that `10 lakh be paid as compensation to Anju’s parents. Charges were framed against him in the case after his sister-in-law and mother-in-law chemical anchor alleged that he used to torture Anju for dowry.

For all this while, we were silent about it because the judgement was yet to come. Muralidhar and Vinod Goel allowed the appeal of Ilyasi challenging his conviction and life imprisonment for killing his wife, Anju, who was found dead in her home on January 11, 2000. We have suffered a lot but I trust my father and I had always trusted him," she said."The appeal is allowed," the bench said.The high court, which had on April 26 granted interim bail to Ilyasi, refused to extend the relief on May 14. I am not able to express myself much right now.Ilyasi, in his appeal moved through advocate Rajiv Mohan, has claimed that the police had not collected any material for three months after the incident and there was no evidence to charge him for the offence of murder.The police had claimed that he had misled the investigating agency, proving his involvement in the crime. He later moved the Supreme Court, which also refused to grant him interim bail


برچسب: ،
امتیاز:
 
بازدید:
+ نوشته شده: ۱۹ شهريور ۱۳۹۸ساعت: ۰۶:۰۱:۵۲ توسط:mecconcrehan موضوع:

{COMMENTS}
ارسال نظر
نام :
ایمیل :
سایت :
آواتار :
پیام :
خصوصی :
کد امنیتی :